Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Part Six - E is the first Factor of Note

Part Six - Equations for the Joyous Mind
E is the first Factor of Note

“E” must be resolved before any other calculations can be resolved.

I was initially inspired by a case in which I could not help but believe all modern theories and beliefs concerning the human brain, but more importantly, the human mind, were essentially insufficient, or even simply wrong.  Or, at the very least, very inadequate to helping this particular person; who just happened to be my youngest daughter.
            About 35 years ago my oldest son began his academic career in Pre-School.  He was tested and we were told he was a “slow learner”.  Our employment situation changed and we moved to a different state.  He was tested there and we were told he was “gifted”.  Moved again and he suddenly became not so gifted.
            Fed up, we put him in a private school.  It cost a lot and we lived very tight for many years.
            Today he is a Doctor with degrees from Cornell, UNH and Yeshiva University Einstein Medical.  We went through a similar scenario with our oldest daughter and our next 3 sons.  Our oldest daughter is a successful architect and our second son also became a medical Doctor.
            When I became a High School teacher I saw a distinct pattern emerging.  Students who have distinctive thinking patterns can suffer as much in commonly applied American pedagogy, as students with diagnosed “Learning Differences”.  In fact, often they suffer more because their problems are most often seen as personality disorders by most teachers.
            For most adults, anything they don’t understand with young people is often attributed to a personality issue or, in an even worse scenario, to a Learning Disability.  In the latter case, this can have a very deliterous effect on the child.  Even today there continues to be stigmas attatched to the label of Learning Disability. When quite often what is creating a barrier to particular child’s learning and retention in a given classroom situation is actuallly a factor, or factors, that having nothing at all to do with that child’s neurological make-up.
            This means the, sometimes, an evaluation of that child’s overall position (for lack of a better terminalogy) in that particular classroom and their relationship, as it exists or devleops, with that particular teacher.
            So, when we attach a value system to formulae distiguishing as much of the real factors existant within a given environment, it becomes possible to determine what might be holding a particular student from achieving the best results from their learning efforts. 
            Example: Rather than using the numeral “0” for a given factor, which might seem mathematically necessary, it is used more as a space  is in computer code.  Or, rather than zero it indicates “end-of-line”.  Meaning, “end-of-command” – essentially it means STOP.  Further – nothing is happening (occuring)stall or neutral stasis.
            When a child enters a classroom immediately after an emotionally negative experience, the Emotional Quotient, “E” is going to be noted, within the calculation, as “0”.   If E=1, then the child is emotionally alert and receptive.  If E=2, then the child is emotinally active.  In relation to Emotions, “Omega Learning” cannot be achieved with any factor other than a value of “1”, since an “0” or “2” indicates the presence of some kind of barrier.  In the instance of E values, there needs to be a definite empathetic understanding of the age of the child and their general individual station within a particular classroom dynamic.  It would seem there are almost an infinite number of factors that can affect the E.  Observable logic will place and ascribe a value to most of these, as such then reducing all of them to either stasis 0), active/alert (1) or barred – the presence of a barrier – (2).

Child is upset (E0).  Child is over-stimulated (E2).  Child is sleepy (E0).  Child is angry (E2).  Now it becomes part of the evaluation to determine if any of these values are consistant on a daily basis, or  just of the moment.  The argumentative scholar would come up with a million variables – and yet, yes, I admit thare are a million variables.  In an attempt to address this, I will cite one unique personal experience as a teacher:

Noah:  One of my students, let’s call him Noah – all emotional factors could be observed to be (E1).  Good student, neutral family, social, etc. values; all (E1) consistantly.  Except one very sigular element.  Noah, as I noted during his first class, had a highly sensitive hearing reaction to any sounds in the high sympathetic auditory register.  Or, “fingernails on a blackboard” just drove him crazy.  Once again, obvious observation, told me, for Noah, this screeching type of sound made him visibly upset – uncontrollably so.

Since the norm in current education is to use dry-erasable markers on slick whiteboards, do not produce this type of auditory factor, I was unaware the same effect applys to other written media.  Occassionally old style ballpoint pens on rough paper, pencils on certain surfaces and yes, rubbing on a balloon or other kinds of synthetic materials.

Now if left unrecognized as upsetting to him, Noah would instantly become agitated and his E quotient would take a value of (E2).  This reaction might seem peculiar to the average person, often it would go unrecognized by a lot of his teachers.  The rest of that class would become very difficult for him.  All that was required was for me to say, “Whoops, sorry about that Noah.” when this happened and he almost as instantly forgot about it.  Back to (E1) as instantly.

Argumentative scholar:  A teacher can’t remember that for every peculiarity for every student!  I don’t think this is any different than knowing any person on a regular basis, who has a peanut allergy.  Once determined, these things just become part of all interactions with those persons.  Making an issue of it will rescore every interaction in a teaching/learning instance instantly to (E2) and the “Learning Equation” is unresolvable to the “Omega State”.


I will provide the actual formula in the next chapter, part or blog.

Thank you for joining me here and joy be unto you.

All material in this blog is from “Equations for the Joyous Mind”  © 2016 by Dale Clarence Peterson

dalepeterson.us

Just published  Twelve Roses for Kathy – A journey on a motorcycle out of the darkness of bipolar disorder”

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Part Five: The Codex or Rosetta Stone


The Codex, or "Rosetta Stone"

I have included two .png formatted graphics to plot the calculations as will be put forward as we proceed in this study.  In the first, the text towards the left reads as follows:  (Re-edited and expanded 8/31/16)

So we have the mind being equal to the organic brain with all the stimuli being exerted on its sensory gathering times (multiplied by) the chemical influences arising from the natural reaction due to the emotional state resulting from both.

This is then factored by the degree of distraction(s) arising from uncontrolled stimuli in the person's environment at the time of the unique event.

This distraction is further affected by whatever emotional state that exists at the given instant of any unique teaching and learning experience.  The goal here is to determine what, of all the influences that truly exist in a given unique event of teaching and learning, are affecting the event and how they can be neutralized. 

The organic brain is a bound system.  It cannot extend beyond the boundaries of its organic limitations; i.e. it is alive or not, it is aware or it is not.  It reacts within the scope of a curve of hormone balance (chemistry) that is often genetically, or through some physical trauma, altered, state.  Sometimes, if this unique state is unbalanced, or beyond a functional curve which affects the receptivity of instruction aimed at a general audience (read; “normal”) it can be medically brought more within the general curve.  Sometimes this is not possible, and in those instances where other means to accomplish a rebalancing are ineffective – or, simply not possible – there are answers.  However, any calculations to determine the best possible route(s) to accomplish this are by necessity, unique to a unique mind and brain (read; student).

Examples for those individuals whom are beyond this “general curve” will be explored separately, and more deeply, in later chapters.  Which is more the actual purpose of my treatise.  Understanding that, most often, it is those who function beyond, and never below (I simply do not accept that any human brain should ever be considered less than any other), who do truly bring JOY and understanding to the totality of the human life experience.

And, there are really no levels of awareness or unawareness at any given instant.  We must be careful not to confuse rapidity of processing with simultaneous processing, as is so often the case with computer technology.  What we must be careful to understand is just what is being derived from the unawareness level that is influencing the processing on the awareness level.
                       
If we believe, as we all tend to do, that we want to achieve a positive effect, then we reintroduce various "E" factors (Emotional), the major of which is E-beta (locate on the Codex).

"Emotion" does not necessarily exist as either positive or negative, but often as a fluctuating composite of both.  Often if a heightened state of one, even if it is positive, is present then the opposite is not far away and ready to exert influence at even very minor changes in the environment of a unique event.
 
Therefore, as with the wisdom of the ages and across almost all cultures, to achieve balance we must seek neutrality.



Or, as might be less blurry and possibly "cleaner.




In the next part, we will break down the first three "Premises" and show the "equating" of those formulae.

Thank you for joining me here and joy be unto you.

All material in this blog is from “Equations for the Joyous Mind”  © 2016 by Dale Clarence Peterson

dalepeterson.us

Just published  Twelve Roses for Kathy – A journey on a motorcycle out of the darkness of bipolar disorder”


Thursday, August 25, 2016

Part Four: Basic Chart and Historic Connection

Part Four: Basic Chart and Historic Connection

CAVEAT:  I must say it is very frustrating, but I have tried every graphics format and trick I know and I simply cannot get these charts to load on Blogger with an acuity.  But I will continue to work on it.  If There are any readers of this blog who have advice on this matter, please do write to me.  Thank you tremendously, in advance.

Below is Figure 4 and the original chart I designed sometime in about 2006, after intense research of Bloom, Edgar Dale, Howard Gardner and deep reflection on the writings of Temple Grandin - amongst others.  An early favorite of mine is Jean Piaget.

Understanding that almost all of Piaget's research was based on observations of his own three children - and not a lot of much else.  And those of Dr. Grandin's are those of a very high functioning Autistic person reaching across an almost unfathomable distance to connect with those of us far less gifted.


Premise 3:  Premise Three works with the single aspect of Recall.
Since, it is recall which, in my concepts and theories, connects the organic brain with the deeper meta-cognative processing of the mind. Bearing in mind that cognitive processing is electrical impulsing between nerve synapses.  And, that once established there can no longer be found the presence of "0" (zero).  When the first vector point is established, it must either transverse to another vector point or that standing solitary, it exists as "1" (the integer one).  Use the non-pointy end of the pencil and erase the symbol and you cannot say that you have returned to 0, you have only removed the symbol.

If you then claim that since the symbol is gone, that it no longer exists.  My answer, "If a tree grows in a remote forest and there is no one there to see it, is really there?  If it is, or does, or can, then it is - simply is.  If not, then how'd the *** forest get there around it?  If it grows until its life force is gone and then falls, there is an absence of that tree surrounded by others."  Or, "You walk to the orange grove carrying your fruit bucket.  You pick four oranges.  As you walk home, you feel the charity to give each of those oranges to four different people.  While each of the oranges were in the bucket, they functioned as four distinct integers, diminishing in total until there were none left. You return home with 0 (zero) oranges, but you're still carrying a bucket."

There is nothing, then there is something, then there is never nothing again.  Newton, or somebody wrote a law of physics to that matter; i.e. "Matter cannot be created or destroyed."  By this logic, mathematically there is universal need for the integer 0, but there is no actual proof that it is.  Meaning, in terms of cognition - once presented to a mind virginal in a piece of knowledge, in some manner it remains as long as there is the original organic brain to retain it.  So that brings us back to Base 3, since once 1 is established, while 0 holds a place, it can no longer be utilized in any calculations establishing further knowledge acquisition.


In the next blog, I will publish my "Codex", or Rosetta Stone of symbols.

Thank you for joining me here and joy be unto you.

All material in this blog is from “Equations for the Joyous Mind”  © 2016 by Dale Clarence Peterson

dalepeterson.us

Just published  Twelve Roses for Kathy – A journey on a motorcycle out of the darkness of bipolar disorder”





Monday, August 22, 2016

Part Three: The Second Premise

Part Three: The Second Premise

“What is the precise definition of a handful of Air?”

Education has a computer technology presence on campus, and is part of performance expectation, and yet is often one that is very unruly and inconsistent.  However, it can run the gamut from a total disinterest on the part of some teachers and very high technology demands on the part of others.
            And yet, the students they teach have never known a world without it.  It has affected their thinking modalities.
  

CAPTION;  "Recall (R)", or memory, is a state of activity.  “R” Recall embodies awareness, therefore must be represented by "Omega-minor" as the only time it can be passive is when a person is asleep.  However, " R " does work at high and low levels depending on the state of the mind, the brain and the emotions.  When the mind and the brain are in "active Omega", or "neutrality", and the emotions are in neutrality, then the "recall" can be very effective in calculations involving proto-activity.
[proto-activity is a word of my own construction, refering to various activities, or experiences, that a person (student) may be encountering for the first time.]

Muscle and sinew grow weak with age, but knowledge has the potential to remain strong.  The caveat to this statement is that today knowledge is not built with facts, knowledge is built with cognitive processing  skills.  To put another way, it has been held on to as a given that knowledge is built on a foundation of prior knowledge which has been built on solid facts or information that is in some way irrifutable. 
            What was once thought to be a world of reality ruled and governed by definitives, by facts, has somehow changed.  As science has become more capable in determining more and more reliable data, what makes up our reality, that reality has taken on a nature that resembles what was once thought to be fantasy.
            Solid matter, we are told, is more empty space than solid.  Liquids are actually more dense than solids, hence their liquidity.  Gases are merely solids or liquids that by their nature have not yet quite gelled through the lack of a catalyst of some kind.  The universe originated by a single event. It occurred as one of many possible events that happen all the time.
            Knowledge of value today is not what you know, knowledge of value today is what you can do.  Intellectual strength today is what you are capable of learning while you are doing something. Applicable literacy today is what you are capable of learning while you are doing something unrelated to what you are learning.  This begins not with what education you receive, but how you receive that education.
            Not to be misinterpreted, “A dog might not remember a voice command, but if you ever kick that dog, it will remember you.” (Forever, pretty much.) 
            How does knowledge remain strong?  Knowledge that is used on a reasonably regular basis, remains stronger than knowledge that has little to no relavance to a given person’s life, and is therefore used rarely or only accessed on an unrelated irregular basis.  Knowledge that is held in play longer, is experienced more, roots deeper and has the most memory stamina.  Analogies would be any athletic activity or some form of manual skill that is practiced until the motions become second nature.  As in, a Concert Pianist doesn’t really have to look at the keyboard in order to make beautiful music. 
            However, to get to this stage of “Omega Mind” (to be exponded upon) we must return to the very intial concept of the Math.  And how mathematics is based, or rooted upon, a single foundation; i.e. exactly on what  Base are we operating , or what is the primary structure.  As previously stated if this Base is binary, very quickly any calculations derived from any collected data will topple over.  It’s like trying to get a sincle piece of paper to stand vertically on its edge.
            To complete that analogy; if you bend, or fold, that piece of paper, thereby adding dimension to its structure you can actually do this. Or, just as a milking stool, three legs will stand independantly and are actually more stable than four legs.  If you reduce the concept of Prime Numbers to its simplest state, you get Base 3.  In all states Primary Numbers are always more stable than non-primary.  Look at any swivel chair manufactured today.  Most have five feet, some seven.  None have two, obviously, and none have four.  Some yahoo will always find a way to tip over backwards on a four footed swivel chair.


CAPTION;  Figure 4 (I ask forgivenes, Dear Reader, for the blurriness here.  I am reformatting all of my old graphics.) This chart is derrived from the Edgar Dale in the previous Part of this blog.  From Dale’s chart, it is my observation, were derived all of the visuals used in subsequent work by Benjaming Bloom and in more modern terms, eventually, by Howard Gardner in his work on “Multiple Intelligenses”

My purpose in including the chart above (Figure 4) is to begin to expose how using a visual cue with a verbal (written language) outline structure is really just an attempt to push into some sort of box, what is actually a very complex systematic approach to a concept that is, in real world functioning, actually, an impossibile task.  Much as simply trying to write the above sentence – and have it make sense. 

In the next installment, I will include historical examples which were designed to accomplish the same general task and begin to clarify how the Binary System (Base 2 math), in its infantsy, changed European culture forever.  And, step one as to why is doesn’t work.

Peace and joy be unto you, Dear Reader.
           

All material in this blog is from “Equations for the Joyous Mind”  © 2016 by Dale Clarence Peterson

dalepeterson.us

Just published  Twelve Roses for Kathy – A journey on a motorcycle out of the darkness of bipolar disorder”